Understanding Multi-Stage Docker Builds

Introduction

Docker has revolutionized how we build, ship, and run software by allowing developers to package applications in containerized environments. However, as applications grow in complexity, Docker image sizes can significantly increase, leading to slower build times, increased storage requirements, and potential security vulnerabilities.

Docker multi-stage builds provide a solution to these challenges. Multi-stage builds allow you to create optimized Docker images by leveraging multiple stages within a single Dockerfile. Each stage represents a separate build environment, enabling you to separate the build dependencies from the runtime dependencies. This approach results in smaller, more secure, and easier-to-maintain final images.

In this blog post, we will explore the concept of multi-stage builds and how they can help you create efficient and optimized Docker images for your applications. We'll dive into the benefits of multi-stage builds, such as reducing image size, improving build times, enhancing security, and simplifying Dockerfile maintenance. By the end of this post, you'll have a solid understanding of implementing multi-stage builds effectively in your Docker projects.

Understanding Single-Stage Docker Builds

Before diving into multi-stage builds, let's look at traditional single-stage Docker builds and their characteristics. A traditional single-stage Dockerfile typically consists of instructions defining the build process for a Docker image. Here's an example

FROM golang:1.22

WORKDIR /app

COPY go.mod go.sum ./
RUN go mod download

COPY . .

RUN go build -o main .

EXPOSE 8080

CMD ["./main"]

This single-stage Dockerfile starts with the official Go 1.22 base image, sets the working directory, copies the necessary files, downloads dependencies, builds the Go application, and exposes the required port. The resulting image combines the build process and the runtime in a single stage, leading to a larger image size that includes the Go compiler and all the build dependencies.

Single-stage Docker builds have some advantages:

Simplicity: Single-stage builds are easy to understand, especially for more straightforward applications.
Familiarity: Many developers are accustomed to writing single-stage Dockerfiles, making them a common approach.

However, single-stage builds in Docker also have several limitations and can lead to various issues and problems:

Large image size: Single-stage builds often result in larger image sizes because they include both build and runtime dependencies in the final image. This can lead to increased storage requirements and slower image transfer times.
Longer build times: As the image grows due to the inclusion of build dependencies, the build process becomes slower, especially if the build dependencies are large or complex. This can impact development productivity and slow down the overall development cycle.
Security concerns: Including build tools and unnecessary dependencies in the final image can increase the attack surface and introduce potential security vulnerabilities. Runtime images should ideally contain only the necessary components to run the application, minimizing the risk of security issues.
Dockerfile maintenance: As applications evolve, maintaining a single-stage Dockerfile can become complex and error-prone, especially when dealing with multiple build steps and dependencies. Keeping the Dockerfile clean, readable, and maintainable becomes challenging over time.
Inefficient caching: Single-stage builds may not effectively utilize the caching mechanisms provided by Docker. If the build dependencies or early stages of the build process change, the entire build needs to be rerun, leading to redundant builds and slower development cycles.

These limitations and issues highlight the need for a more efficient and optimized approach to building Docker images, where multi-stage builds are crucial.

Enter Multi-Stage Docker Builds

Multi-stage Docker builds provide an efficient way to create optimized Docker images by separating the build environment from the runtime environment. This results in smaller, more secure, and easier-to-maintain images.

A multi-stage Dockerfile consists of multiple FROM statements, each representing a separate stage with its own base image and instructions. Here's an example:

# Build stage
FROM golang:1.22 AS build
WORKDIR /app
COPY . .
RUN go build -o main .

# Runtime stage
FROM alpine:3.20
WORKDIR /app
COPY --from=build /app/main .
CMD ["./main"]

The build stage compiles the application, while the runtime stage includes only the compiled binary and necessary runtime dependencies. This separation leads to several advantages:

Smaller image sizes: By including only the essential runtime components, multi-stage builds produce significantly smaller images than single-stage builds. Smaller images result in faster image transfers, reduced storage requirements, and quicker container startup times.
Improved security: Excluding build tools, compilers, and development dependencies from the final image reduces the attack surface and minimizes the risk of security vulnerabilities.
Better maintainability: Separating the build and runtime stages makes the Dockerfile more modular and easier to maintain. You can update the build dependencies without impacting the runtime environment and vice versa.
Faster builds: Multi-stage builds can more effectively leverage caching. If the build dependencies or application code haven't changed, subsequent builds can reuse cached layers, resulting in faster build times.
Parallelization: Multi-stage builds enable parallelization of the build process. Different stages can be built concurrently, allowing for faster overall build times. This is particularly beneficial for complex applications with multiple components or dependencies.
Flexibility: Multi-stage builds offer flexibility in choosing different base images for each stage. For the build stage, you can use a larger base image with all the necessary build tools, and then use a minimal base image for the runtime stage, optimizing the final image size.

By adopting multi-stage builds, you can create efficient, secure, and maintainable Docker images well-suited for production deployments. The separation of build and runtime environments and the ability to parallelize the build process make multi-stage builds a powerful tool in your Docker development workflow.

Anatomy of a Multi-Stage Dockerfile

Let's dive deeper into the structure of a multi-stage Dockerfile and understand its key components.

Breaking down the stages

A multi-stage Dockerfile consists of multiple stages, each defined by a FROM statement. Each stage represents a separate build environment with its own base image and set of instructions. A stage could require artifacts or outputs from a previous stage. Independent stages can be built concurrently, enabling faster overall build times.

It's important to note that while the stages are defined sequentially in the Dockerfile, the actual execution of independent stages can happen in parallel. Docker handles this parallelization automatically and can significantly speed up the build process, especially for complex applications with multiple independent components or dependencies.

For example:

# Frontend build stage
FROM node:20 AS frontend-build
WORKDIR /app/frontend
COPY frontend/package*.json ./
RUN npm ci
COPY frontend ./
RUN npm run build

# Backend build stage
FROM golang:1.22 AS backend-build
WORKDIR /app/backend
COPY backend/go.mod backend/go.sum ./
RUN go mod download
COPY backend ./
RUN go build -o main .

# Final runtime stage
FROM alpine:3.20
WORKDIR /app
COPY --from=frontend-build /app/frontend/dist ./frontend
COPY --from=backend-build /app/backend/main ./
CMD ["./main"]

In this example, we have three stages: frontend-build for building the frontend assets, backend-build for compiling the backend application, and a final runtime stage that combines the artifacts from the previous stages. The frontend-build and backend-build stages can be built concurrently since they are independent.

Using multiple FROM statements

In a multi-stage Dockerfile, you'll encounter multiple FROM statements, each marking the beginning of a new stage. The FROM statement specifies the base image for that particular stage. For example:

FROM node:20 AS frontend-build
# Frontend build stage instructions

FROM golang:1.22 AS backend-build
# Backend build stage instructions

FROM alpine:3.20
# Final runtime stage instructions

Each stage uses a different base image suited for its specific purpose, such as node for the frontend build, golang for the backend build, and alpine for the lightweight runtime.

Copying artifacts between stages

One of the key features of multi-stage builds is the ability to copy artifacts from one stage to another. This is achieved using the COPY --from instruction. It allows you to selectively copy files or directories from a previous stage into the current stage. For example:

COPY --from=frontend-build /app/frontend/dist ./frontend
COPY --from=backend-build /app/backend/main ./

These instructions copy the built frontend assets from the frontend-build stage and the compiled backend binary from the backend-build stage into the final runtime stage.

Naming stages for clarity

To improve the readability and maintainability of your multi-stage Dockerfile, it's recommended to name your stages using the AS keyword. This allows you to refer to specific stages by name when copying artifacts or using them as a base for subsequent stages. For example:

FROM node:20 AS frontend-build
# Frontend build stage instructions

FROM golang:1.22 AS backend-build
# Backend build stage instructions

FROM alpine:3.20 AS runtime
COPY --from=frontend-build /app/frontend/dist ./frontend
COPY --from=backend-build /app/backend/main ./
# Runtime stage instructions

In this example, the stages are named frontend-build, backend-build, and runtime, making it clear what each stage represents and allowing for easy reference when copying artifacts.

By understanding the anatomy of a multi-stage Dockerfile and utilizing the concepts of stages, multiple FROM statements, copying artifacts between stages, and naming stages for clarity, you can create well-structured and maintainable multi-stage builds for your applications.

Best Practices for Multi-Stage Builds

To make the most of multi-stage builds and optimize your Dockerfiles, consider the following best practices:

Optimizing the build order

Organize your Dockerfile stages in a way that optimizes the build process. Place the stages that are less likely to change towards the beginning of the Dockerfile. This allows the cache to be reused more effectively for subsequent builds. For example, if your application dependencies change less frequently than your application code, put the stage that installs dependencies before the stage that copies your application code.

# Install dependencies
FROM node:20 AS deps
WORKDIR /app
COPY package*.json ./
RUN npm ci

# Build the application
FROM node:20 AS build
WORKDIR /app
COPY --from=deps /app/node_modules ./node_modules
COPY . .
RUN npm run build

# Final runtime stage
FROM nginx:alpine
COPY --from=build /app/dist /usr/share/nginx/html

In this example, the dependencies are installed in a separate stage (deps) that comes before the stage that builds the application (build). This way, if only the application code changes, the deps stage can be reused from the cache.

Using a more appropriate base image for each stage

Choose the right base image for each stage of your multi-stage build. For build stages, use an image that includes the necessary build tools and dependencies. For runtime stages, use a lightweight image that contains only the required runtime dependencies. This helps reduce the final image size and improves security.

# Build stage
FROM golang:1.22 AS build
# Build instructions

# Runtime stage
FROM alpine:3.20
COPY --from=build /app/main ./

In this example, the build stage uses the golang image, which includes the Go compiler and tools, while the runtime stage uses the lightweight alpine image, resulting in a smaller final image.

Conclusion

Multi-stage Docker builds are a powerful feature that enables the creation of optimized and efficient Docker images. By separating the build environment from the runtime environment, multi-stage builds help reduce image sizes, improve security, and speed up build times.

Understanding the anatomy of a multi-stage Dockerfile and following best practices such as optimizing the build order, effectively leveraging the build cache, using appropriate base images, and minimizing the number of layers can greatly enhance your Docker workflow.

Adopting multi-stage builds in your projects leads to more efficient, secure, and maintainable applications, streamlining your development and deployment processes.

If you’re interested in learning more about Docker and how to make your Docker builds faster, check out some of our other blogs

Thank you! We will notify you when we publish new posts!

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Understanding Multi-Stage Docker Builds

Recent Posts

You have 5 days before the new DockerHub limits f*ck you over.

Launch: GitHub Actions Analytics

Deployments still suck, but maybe they don’t have to

Recent Guides

Best Practices for Managing Secrets in GitHub Actions

How to reduce spend in GitHub Actions

Matrix Builds with GitHub Actions

Understanding Multi-Stage Docker Builds

Get notified about new posts

Recent Posts

You have 5 days before the new DockerHub limits f*ck you over.

Launch: GitHub Actions Analytics

Deployments still suck, but maybe they don’t have to

Recent Guides

Best Practices for Managing Secrets in GitHub Actions

How to reduce spend in GitHub Actions

Matrix Builds with GitHub Actions